Posts Tagged ‘painting’

The Gentle Art of Making Enemies #16 – Mulready

Wednesday, April 8th, 2009






    [16] … “The Butcher’s Dog, in the corner of Mr. Mulready’s ‘Butt,’ displays, perhaps, the most wonderful, because the most dignified, finish … and assuredly the most perfect unity of drawing and colour which the entire range of ancient and modern art can exhibit. Albert Durer is, indeed, the only rival who might be suggested.”



    John Ruskin
    Slade Professor of Art: Modern Painters.




     The Butt: Shooting a Cherry Date 1822-1848 oil on canvas Mulready, William (RA), 45.4 38.4 cm



    Mulready, William (RA)
    The Butt: Shooting a Cherry
    1822-1848
    oil on canvas
    45.4 38.4 cm
    Victoria & Albert Museum, London





The Gentle Art of Making Enemies #17 – Titian

Wednesday, April 8th, 2009





Portrait of Doge Andrea Gritti c. 1545 Oil on canvas, 133 x 103 cm National Gallery of Art, Washington







    “It is a portrait of Doge Andrea Gritti, and I believe it is a real Titian. It shows finish. It is a very perfect sample of the highest finish of ancient art.[17]






    [17] … “I feel entitled to point out that the picture by Titian, produced in the case of Whistler v. Ruskin, is an early specimen of that master, and does not represent adequately the style and qualities which have obtained for him his great reputation—one obvious point of difference between this and his more mature work being the far greater amount of finish—I do not say completeness—exhibited in it … and as the picture was brought forward with a view to inform the jury as to the nature of the work of the greatest painter, and more especially as to the high finish introduced in it, it is evident that it was calculated to produce an erroneous impression on their minds, if indeed any one present at the inquiry can hold that those gentlemen were in any way fitted to understand the issues raised therein.—I am, Sir, your obedient servant,



    A. MOORE.
    “Nov. 28.”
    Extract of a letter to the Editor of the Echo.


Titian (TIZIANO Vecellio)
Portrait of Doge Andrea Gritti
c. 1545 Oil on canvas,
133 x 103 cm
National Gallery of Art, Washington





Presenting… Michelangelo – The Last Judgment

Saturday, April 4th, 2009





    439px-michelango_portrait_by_volterra


    Portrait of Michelangelo
    Volterra

















      Daniele da Volterra

      (RICCIARELLI) 1509-1566

      Volterra was a friend of Michelangelo who became known as “Il Bragghetone” (Breeches Maker) after his commission by Paul IV to cover some of the nude figures in Michelangelo’s “Last Judgment”.






    The following extract written by John W Dixon Jr. Professor Emeritus at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, provides a compelling argument to explain what Michelangelo intended from his composition of The Last Judgment. He emphasises that the exuberance of the figures is an “embodiment of the Lord” and is emphatic that “This is, after all, the transfiguration of the body at the end of time. While the painting is, in its own distinctive way, clearly a Last Judgment, it is not simply that. It is necessary to repeat: it is the Resurrection of the Body at the end of time.”



    Following that line of argument leads me to conclude that it is absolutely inconceivable that any clothing would be required to cover the glory of God’s creation and the miracle of resurrection.





    Terror of Salvation: The Last Judgment


    The Transfigured Flesh and the Resurrection of the Body.



    [...] As presented on the ceiling, the bodies are transfigured flesh. As presented on the wall, they are the resurrection of the body. These are, specifically, beautiful bodies. Not all are beautiful; the original of St. Catherine, for example, was grossly obese. The question of beauty cannot be put in the abstract; even more specifically defined, the problem is that of beautiful flesh. The modern temperament, indifferent to religion or defining religion only as doctrine, tends to interpret the presentation of beautiful flesh in one mode only: erotic desire. It is not fitting to deny the presence of either desirability or desire, which would be to offend against the integrity of the human body. The question is the motive and the function of such a presentation.











































    The undeniable influence of ancient sculpture on Michelangelo often serves as a distraction from what he is doing. It raises the complex, difficult question of “idealization” in Greek art, a problem beyond the scope of this study. As applied to sculpture, it seems to mean the art work as imitation of the idea, the essential principle of the human. Despite the resemblance of much of Michelangelo’s work to the Greek, his is never truly an idealization. In this, as in so much else, Michelangelo is a Florentine and a Dantean.


    In Canto XIV of Dante’s Paradiso, Beatrice asks, for Dante, if the souls in paradise will retain the light in which they now appear after they receive their resurrected bodies. Solomon answers:



      As long as the feast of Paradise shall be, so long shall our love radiate around us such a garment. Its brightness follows our ardor, the ardor of our vision, and that is in the measure which each has of grace beyond his merit. When the flesh, glorious and sanctified, shall be clothed on us again, our persons will be more acceptable for being all complete;…


    Paradiso XIV, 38-45. Singleton: 155¯





    “The flesh, glorious and sanctified”, or, as Charles Williams translated it, “Reclothed in the glorious and holy flesh” (“la carne gloriosa e santa”) (Williams: 207). As is normal with Michelangelo, he does not here illustrate Dante, for he is not representing Paradise. Shaped by Dante and his own insight, he defines the body as it had not been before (except, perhaps by the very non-carnal Fra Angelico).




    libyan-studylibyan-fresco









    Michelangelo does not present the idealized body but the transfigured body, the body as it is in the creative mind of God. The flesh is luminous in its transformation, a luminosity that was discernible even under the dirt but now is revealed in all its glory by the present cleaning. It is the flesh as such that is holy and glorious. The ignudi possess it and the soft and glowing back of the Libyan Sibyl is female flesh at its finest. By its nature, all flesh is glorious and beautiful. He eliminates the immediate and the adventitious, not for a Platonic idea but for the uncovering of the glory.






    Classical figures are at ease in their bodies; body and spirit are in complete harmony by their ideal nature. Michelangelo’s figures are willful and intense. The beauty of the holy flesh is an achievement. It is not an achievement in the sense of starting from nothing or even from corruption; the holy flesh is the original quality of creation. It is not for nothing that Adam is the most beautiful male figure on the ceiling. Quite unlike the Greek, Michelangelo’s figures always posses will and will is corruptible. That corruption comes to its full statement in the sodden collapse of Noah’s drunkenness. Its workings are explored in its various moments of human history, presented to us in the different levels of the ceiling.




    Always Michelangelo transcends the pain of history in terms of his vision of the transfigured body.




    The holy and glorious flesh was at the heart of what he had to say on the ceiling. On the wall it was the resurrection of the body. When the cleaning is completed we will know better how far he went in presenting the transfigured flesh. As it is, we can see the bodies in their magnificent strength and energy but no longer so self-sufficient or self-contained as they were on the ceiling. Now they are participants in the redemptive action, defined by their place in it, that place determined by their free choice.




    The damned move with freedom of action but, since they have rejected the source of humane action, they achieve only violence, despair, vain rebellion and confusion. The redeemed are variously taken up into the coherent unity of divine presence. They participate in the energy that proceeds from the central figure of the redeeming Christ.




MICHELANGELO Buonarroti Last Judgment 1537-41 Fresco, 1370 x 1220 cm Cappella Sistina, Vatican


MICHELANGELO Buonarroti
Last Judgment 1537-41
Fresco, 1370 x 1220 cm
Cappella Sistina, Vatican









    Extract from ‘The Terror of Salvation: The Last Judgment’ © John W. Dixon, Jr. all rights reserved.



Presenting… Veronese – Feast in the House of Levi

Tuesday, March 31st, 2009






    Paolo Galliari Veronese residing in the parish of Saint Samuel, called to the Holy Office 18 July 1573 and asked his profession before the sacred tribunal…

    Answer. I paint and make figures.


    Question. Do you know the reasons why you have been called here?
    A. No.

    Feast in the House of Levi detail 3




















    Q. Can you imagine what those reasons may be?
    A. I can well imagine.


    Q. Say what you think about them.
    A. I fancy that it concerns what was said to me by the reverend fathers, or rather by the prior of the monastery of San Giovanni e Paolo, whose name I did not know, but who informed me that he had been here, and that your Most Illustrious Lordships had ordered him to cause to be placed in the picture a Magdalen instead of the dog; and I answered him that very readily I would do all that was needful for my reputation and for the honor of the picture; but that I did not understand what this figure of the Magdalen could be doing here; and this for many reasons, which I will tell, when occasion is granted me to speak.


    Q. What is the picture to which you have been referring?
    A. It is the picture which represents the Last Supper of Jesus Christ with His disciples in the house of Simon.


    Q. Where is this picture?
    A. In the refectory of the monks of San Giovanni e Paolo.


    Q. Is it painted in fresco or on wood or on canvas?
    A. It is on canvas.


    Q. How many feet does it measure in height?
    A. It may measure seventeen feet.


    Q. And in breadth?
    A. About thirty-nine.





veronese-feast-in-the-house-of-levi-full-size






    Q. How many have you represented? And what is each one doing?
    A. First there is the innkeeper, Simon; then, under him, a carving squire whom I supposed to have come there for his pleasure, to see how the service of the table is managed. There are many other figures which I cannot remember, however, as it is a long time since I painted that picture.


    Q. How you painted other Last Suppers besides that one?
    A. Yes.


    Q. How many have you painted? Where are they?
    A. I painted one at Verona for the reverend monks of San Lazzaro; it is in their refectory. Another is in the refectory of the reverend brothers of San Giorgio here in Venice.


    Q. But that one is not a Last Supper, and is not even called the Supper of Our Lord.
    A. I painted another in the refectory of San Sebastiano in Venice, another at Padua for the Fathers of the Maddalena. I do not remember to have made any others.


    Q. In this Supper which you painted for San Giovanni e Paolo, what signifies the figure of him whose nose is bleeding?
    A. He is a servant who has a nose-bleed from some accident.





    veronese-feast-in-the-house-of-levi-detail-2











    Q. What signify those armed men dressed in the fashion of Germany, with halberds in their hands?
    A. It is necessary here that I should say a score of words.


    Q. Say them.
    A. We painters use the same license as poets and madmen, and I represented those halberdiers, the one drinking, the other eating at the foot of the stairs, but both ready to do their duty, because it seemed to me suitable and possible that the master of the house, who as I have been told was rich and magnificent, would have such servants.





    veronese-feast-in-the-house-of-levi-detail-1
















    Q. And the one who is dressed as a jester with a parrot on his wrist, why did you put him into the picture?
    A. He is there as an ornament, as it is usual to insert such figures.






    Q. Who are the persons at the table of Our Lord?
    A. The twelve apostles.


    Q. What is Saint Peter doing, who is the first?
    A. He is carving the lamb in order to pass it to the other part of the table.


    Q. What is he doing who comes next?
    A. He holds a plate to see what Saint Peter will give him.


    Q. Tell us what the third is doing.
    A. He is picking his teeth with a fork.


    Q. And who are really the persons whom you admit to have been present at this Supper?
    A. I believe that there was only Christ and His Apostles; but when I have some space left over in a picture I adorn it with figures of my own invention.


    Q. Did some person order you to paint Germans, buffoons, and other similar figures in this picture?
    A. No, but I was commissioned to adorn it as I thought proper; now it is very large and can contain many figures.


    Q. Should not the ornaments which you were accustomed to paint in pictures be suitable and in direct relation to the subject, or are they left to your fancy, quite without discretion or reason?
    A. I paint my pictures with all the considerations which are natural to my intelligence, and according as my intelligence understands them.


    Q. Does it seem suitable to you, in the Last Supper of our Lord, to represent buffoons, drunken Germans, dwarfs, and other such absurdities?
    A. Certainly not.


    Q. Then why have you done it?
    A. I did it on the supposition that those people were outside the room in which the Supper was taking place.


    Q. Do you not know that in Germany and other countries infested by heresy, it is habitual, by means of pictures full of absurdities, to vilify and turn to ridicule the things of the Holy Catholic Church, in order to teach false doctrine to ignorant people who have no common sense?
    A. I agree that it is wrong, but I repeat what I have said, that it is my duty to follow the examples given me by my masters.


    Q. Well, what did your masters paint? Things of this kind, perhaps?
    A. In Rome, in the Pope’s Chapel, Michelangelo has represented Our Lord, His Mother, St. John, St. Peter, and the celestial court; and he has represented all these personages nude, including the Virgin Mary, and in various attitudes not inspired by the most profound religious feeling.


    Q. Do you not understand that in representing the Last Judgment, in which it is a mistake to suppose that clothes are worn, there was no reason for painting any? But in these figures what is there that is not inspired by the Holy Spirit? There are neither buffoons, dogs, weapons, nor other absurdities. Do you think, therefore, according to this or that view, that you did well in so painting your picture, and will you try to prove that it is a good and decent thing?
    A. No, my most Illustrious Sirs; I do not pretend to prove it, but I had not thought that I was doing wrong; I had never taken so many things into consideration. I had been far from imaging such a great disorder, all the more as I had placed these buffoons outside the room in which Our Lord was sitting.


    These things having been said, the judges pronounced that the aforesaid Paolo should be obliged to correct his picture within the space of three months from the date of the reprimand, according to the judgments and decision of the Sacred Court, and altogether at the expense of the said Paolo.




    “Et ita decreverunt omni melius modo.”
    (And so they decided everything for the best!)







    Translation from the Italian by Charles Yriarte
    published, among other places in Francis Marion Crawford’s Salve Venetia, New York, 1905. Vol. II: 29-34.







    Veronese simply changed the title of his painting from ‘The Feast in the House of Simon’ to ‘The Feast in the House of Levi’. There is an earlier canvas by Veronese called Feast in the House of Simon – it’s slightly smaller at only 710cm wide and includes two dogs ‘centre stage’ but none of the other characters objected to by the inquisition and as a Magdalen is also present that seems to have made this earlier canvas acceptable.









Presenting… Kobayashi Eitaku

Friday, March 6th, 2009





Izanami and Izanagi Creating the Japanese Islands

    Izanami and Izanagi Creating the Japanese Islands













      Izanami and Izanagi Creating the Japanese Islands
      Original Title: Izanagi o motte Izanami o saguru no zu
      Japanese, Meiji era, mid-1880s
      Kobayashi Eitaku, Japanese, 1843–1890

      Image: 126 x 54.6 cm (49 5/8 x 21 1/2 in.)
      Overall: 226 x 78.9 cm (89 x 31 1/16 in.)
      Hanging scroll; ink and color on silk






      The last couple, forming the fifth generation, are Izanagi and Izanami, appellations signifying the male Kami of desire and the female Kami of desire. By all the other Kami these two are commissioned to “make, consolidate, and give birth to the drifting land,” a jewelled spear being given to them as a token of authority, and a floating bridge being provided to carry them to earth. Izanagi and Izanami thrust the spear downwards and stir the “brine” beneath, with the result that it coagulates, and, dropping from the spear’s point, forms the first of the Japanese islands, Onogoro.




      This island they take as the basis of their future operations, and here they beget, by ordinary human processes–which are described without any reservations–first, “a great number of islands, and next, a great number of Kami.” It is related that the first effort of procreation was not successful, the outcome being a leechlike abortion and an island of foam, the former of which was sent adrift in a boat of reeds.




      The islands afterwards created form a large part of Japan, but between these islands and the Kami, begotten in succession to them, no connexion is traceable. In several cases the names of the Kami seem to be personifications of natural objects. Thus we have the Kami of the “wind’s breath,” of the sea, of the rivers, of the “water-gates” (estuaries and ports), of autumn, of “foam-calm,” of “bubbling waves,” of “water-divisions,” of trees, of mountains, of moors, of valleys, etc. But with very rare exceptions, all these Kami have no subsequent share in the scheme of things and cannot be regarded as evidence that the Japanese were nature worshippers.





      A change of method is now noticeable. Hitherto the process of production has been creative; henceforth the method is transformation preceded by destruction. Izanami dies in giving birth to the Kami of fire, and her body is disintegrated into several beings, as the male and female Kami of metal mountains, the male and female Kami of viscid clay, the female Kami of abundant food, and the Kami of youth; while from the tears of Izanagi as he laments her decease is born the female Kami of lamentation. Izanagi then turns upon the child, the Kami of fire, which has cost Izanami her life, and cuts off its head; whereupon are born from the blood that stains his sword and spatters the rocks eight Kami, whose names are all suggestive of the violence that called them into existence. An equal number of Kami, all having sway over mountains, are born from the head and body of the slaughtered child.




      At this point an interesting episode is recorded. Izanagi visits the “land of night,” with the hope of recovering his spouse.(1) He urges her to return, as the work in which they were engaged is not yet completed. She replies that, unhappily having already eaten within the portals of the land of night, she may not emerge without the permission of the Kami (2) of the underworld, and she conjures him, while she is seeking that permission, not to attempt to look on her face. He, however, weary of waiting, breaks off one of the large teeth of the comb that holds his hair (3) and, lighting it, uses it as a torch. He finds Izanami’s body in a state of putrefaction, and amid the decaying remains eight Kami of thunder have been born and are dwelling. Izanagi, horrified, turns and flees, but Izanami, enraged that she has been “put to shame,” sends the “hideous hag of hades” to pursue him.




      He obtains respite twice; first by throwing down his head-dress, which is converted into grapes, and then casting away his
      comb, which is transformed into bamboo sprouts, and while the hag stops to eat these delicacies, he flees. Then Izanami sends in his pursuit the eight Kami of thunder with fifteen hundred warriors of the underworld(4). He holds them off for a time by brandishing his sword behind him, and finally, on reaching the pass from the nether to the upper world, he finds three peaches growing there with which he pelts his pursuers and drives them back. The peaches are rewarded with the title of “divine fruit,” and entrusted with the duty of thereafter helping all living people (5) in the central land of “reed plains” (6) as they have helped Izanagi.





      Notes
      1 It is unnecessary to comment upon the identity of this incident with the legend of Orpheus and Eurydice.

      2 It will be observed that we hear of these Kami now for the first time.

      3 This is an obvious example of a charge often preferred against the compilers of the Records that they inferred the manners and customs of remote antiquity from those of their own time.

      4 Again we have here evidence that the story of creation, as told in the Records, is not supposed to be complete. It says nothing as to how the denizens of the underworld came into existence.

      5 The first mention of human beings.

      6 This epithet is given to Japan.





      This curious legend does not end here. Finding that the hag of hades, the eight Kami of thunder, and the fifteen hundred warriors have all been repulsed, Izanami herself goes in pursuit. But her way is blocked by a huge rock which Izanagi places in the “even pass of hades,” and from the confines of the two worlds the angry pair exchange messages of final separation, she threatening to kill a thousand folk daily in his land if he repeats his acts of violence, and he declaring that, in such event, he will retaliate by causing fifteen hundred to be born.




      In all this, no mention whatever is found of the manner in which human beings come into existence: they make their appearance upon the scene as though they were a primeval part of it. Izanagi, whose return to the upper world takes place in southwestern Japan (1), now cleanses himself from the pollution he has incurred by contact with the dead, and thus inaugurates the rite of purification practised to this day in Japan. The Records describe minutely the process of his unrobing before entering a river, and we learn incidentally that he wore a girdle, a skirt, an upper garment, trousers, a hat, bracelets on each arm, and a necklace, but no mention is made of footgear. Twelve Kami are born from these various articles as he discards them, but without exception these additions to Japanese mythology seem to have nothing to do with the scheme of the universe: their titles appear to be wholly capricious, and apart from figuring once upon the pages of the Records they have no claim to notice. The same may be said of eleven among fourteen Kami thereafter born from the pollution which Izanagi washes off in a river.





      Note
      1 At Himuka in Kyushu, then called Tsukushi.